Symbolic Meaning in Digital Political Practice: An Analysis of Political Language on Social Media in the 2024 Makassar Mayoral Election

Penulis

  • Hasruddin Nur Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • A. Octamaya Tenri Awaru Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v24i2.1058

Kata Kunci:

symbolic language, political communication, social media, local election, Makassar, symbolic interactionism

Abstrak

This study examines the construction, circulation, and contestation of symbolic meaning in political language on social media during the 2024 Makassar mayoral election. In contemporary local elections, social media has become more than a channel for transmitting campaign information; it functions as a symbolic arena in which political identities, local cultural claims, and affective attachments are continuously produced and negotiated. Using symbolic interactionism as the main analytical framework, this qualitative case study analyzes verbal and visual campaign symbols circulated through candidates' official Instagram, X, and Facebook accounts, together with public audience responses in the form of comments, likes, shares, and discursive counter-narratives. The findings show that slogans, hashtags, local linguistic markers, cultural attire, religious icons, and urban landmarks were strategically deployed to construct candidates as populist, culturally rooted, religiously legitimate, and future-oriented figures. However, these symbols did not generate a single stable meaning. Supporters interpreted them as signs of representation, hope, and collective identity, whereas skeptical users reframed the same symbols as empty rhetoric, elite manipulation, or performative populism. The study concludes that social media transformed the Makassar mayoral election into a symbolic performance in which political legitimacy was shaped not only by programs and policy claims but also by the capacity to control, circulate, and defend meanings in digital public space. The article contributes to political communication studies by foregrounding a locally specific Eastern Indonesian case and by showing how symbolic interaction, platform affordances, and local cultural repertoires intersect in digital electoral politics.

Referensi

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press.

Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Edelman, M. (1964). The Symbolic Uses of Politics. University of Illinois Press.

Enli, G. S., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330

Highfield, T., & Leaver, T. (2016). Instagrammatics and digital methods: Studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1155332

Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.

Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 tentang Tahapan dan Jadwal Pemilihan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati, serta Walikota dan Wakil Walikota Tahun 2024.

Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 13 Tahun 2024 tentang Kampanye Pemilihan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati, serta Walikota dan Wakil Walikota.

Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2018). Technology firms shape political communication: The work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google with campaigns during the 2016 U.S. presidential cycle. Political Communication, 35(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Lim, M. (2013). Many clicks but little sticks: Social media activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 636–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.769386

Mattulada. (1998). Sejarah, Masyarakat, dan Kebudayaan Sulawesi Selatan. Hasanuddin University Press.

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press.

Pelras, C. (1996). The Bugis. Blackwell.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. Yale University Press.

Diterbitkan

2025-12-30

Versi

Terbitan

Bagian

Research

Cara Mengutip

Symbolic Meaning in Digital Political Practice: An Analysis of Political Language on Social Media in the 2024 Makassar Mayoral Election. (2025). Tamaddun Life, 24(2), 485-493. https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v24i2.1058 (Original work published 2026)