The Price of Appearances: Materialism in Maupassant’s The Necklace and Modern Consumer Culture

Authors

  • Fitriani Bakri
  • Muhammad Hasbi Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Abdul Halim Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v24i1.933

Keywords:

Reception Theory, Dominant-Hegemonic, Negotiated, Oppositional Position, The Necklace

Abstract

This study aims to explore the readers’ reception on The Necklace short story based on Hall’s reception theory. Employing descriptive-qualitative research design, the study focuses on Hall’s three main reading positions: the dominant-hegemonic, in which the reader decodes the message as intended by the author; the negotiated, where the reader partly accepts and partly resists the message; and the oppositional, where the reader rejects the encoded message entirely. Data were collected through two main instruments: students’ intellectual diaries (reflective journals) and classroom discussions. Data analysis follows Braun & Clarke’s thematic analysis. The findings of this study provide a nuanced understanding of how university students interpret Maupassant’s The Necklace in relation to materialism and contemporary consumer culture, viewed through the lens of Hall’s reception theory. The students’ responses, categorized into dominant-hegemonic, negotiated, and oppositional readings, reveal the multiplicity of interpretive positions shaped by ideological alignment, personal experience, and sociocultural context. This study shows that The Necklace story remains a powerful and relevant story, offering rich opportunities for critical engagement and reflection in the classroom. It becomes evident that literary texts are not static but dynamic sites where meaning is contested and reinterpreted across time and space. This study has shown that literature remains an essential tool for fostering critical thinking and for engaging students with the social, cultural, and ideological issues of their time.

References

Baudrillard, J. (1998). The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London: Sage Publications.

Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beach, R. (1993). A Teacher’s Introduction to Reader-Response Theories. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Beaumont, C. M. (2022). Beyond vanity: Socioeconomic critique in Maupassant's short fiction. Nineteenth-Century French Studies, 48(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncf.2022.0015

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Featherstone, M. (1991). Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. London: Sage.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.

Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Fiske, J. (1987). Television Culture. London: Methuen.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.

Hasbi, M., Bakri, F. & Halim, A. (2025). Enhancing Students Literacy through Intellectual Diary: A Classroom Approach. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(1), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v8i1.43364

Hasbi, M. & Bakri, F. (2024). Beyond the Text: Using English Prose to Expand Students’ Cultural Horizons. Proceedings of the 7th Celt International Conference (CIC 2024), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 897, https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-348-1_23

Hasbi, M., Mahmud, M., & Halim, A. (2023). Lecturer’s Perception on the Integration of 21st Century Learning Skills in the Teaching of English Prose. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, 10 (2), 300-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v10i2.50610

Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.

Holub, R. C. (2023). Reception theory in the digital age: Victorian classics in contemporary classrooms. Comparative Literature Studies, 57(4), 412-429. https://doi.org/10.5325/complitstudies.57.4.0412

Machor, J. L., & Goldstein, P. (Eds.). (2001). Reception Study: From Literary Theory to Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching Scholars. The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3), 3351-33514. https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335

Morrell, E. (2008). Critical Literacy and Urban Youth: Pedagogies of Access, Dissent, and Liberation. New York: Routledge.

Peterson, S. J. (2023). Maupassant's cautionary tales: Victorian lessons for the digital age. Journal of Literary Criticism, 42(3), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/03060315231567898

Rosenblatt, L. M. (2021). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1v3gq8w

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1995). Literature as Exploration (5th ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.

Shor, I. (1992). Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Storey, J. (2018). Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction (8th ed.). London: Routledge.

Sulistiawati, Hikmah, N. & Hasbi, M. (2024). Unveiling Wordsworth's Daffodils: A Semiotic Tapestry of Signs and Symbols. GLENS: Global English Insights Journal, 1(2), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.61220/glens.v1i2.375

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Research

How to Cite

The Price of Appearances: Materialism in Maupassant’s The Necklace and Modern Consumer Culture. (2025). Tamaddun, 24(1), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v24i1.933