The Impact of Teacher’s Reinforcement on Students’ Engagement in English Language Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v24i1.956Kata Kunci:
teacher reinforcement, student engagement, English language learning, verbal reinforcement, non-verbal reinforcementAbstrak
This study explores the impact of teacher reinforcement on student engagement in English language learning at SMPN 40 Makassar. Framed within a descriptive qualitative research design, data were gathered through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews involving one English teacher and seven eighth-grade students. The findings reveal that the teacher employed a variety of verbal and non-verbal reinforcement strategies such as praise, encouragement, eye contact, gestures, and rewards to cultivate a positive and supportive learning environment. From the teacher’s perspective, reinforcement enhanced students’ confidence, encouraged participation, and positively influenced classroom dynamics. Students echoed this view, identifying reinforcement as a key motivational factor that increased their interest, reduced anxiety, and promoted their willingness to engage in classroom activities. The analysis further suggests that reinforcement not only supports behavioral engagement (active participation) but also fosters emotional (enjoyment, confidence) and cognitive (focus, effort) engagement. These results are interpreted through the lens of Skinner’s Operant Conditioning Theory, Bandura’s Social Learning Theory, and Self-Determination Theory by Deci and Ryan, which collectively emphasize the importance of motivation, autonomy, and social connectedness in learning. The study concludes that teacher reinforcement plays a pivotal role in sustaining student engagement across multiple dimensions. It underscores the need for intentional and consistent use of reinforcement strategies that are sensitive to student diversity and classroom context. These findings hold valuable implications for English language educators seeking to create more inclusive, motivating, and learner-centered environments, particularly within junior high school EFL classrooms in Indonesia.
Referensi
Alrabai, F. (2016). The effectiveness of teachers’ motivational strategies in the Saudi EFL classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.972196
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 645–672). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gay, L. R., & Mills, G. E. (2019). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (12th ed.). Pearson Education.
Mantasiah, R., Yusri, Y., Sinring, A., & Aryani, F. (2021). Assessing verbal positive reinforcement of teachers during school from home in the covid-19 pandemic era. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 1037-1050. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14259a
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Neef, N. A., Kranak, M. P., Shapiro, M., Xu, Z., & Catania, A. C. (2022). Changing what teachers say changes what they do: increasing their specific praise of student behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 33(2), 344-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-022-09488-z
Putri, A. A., & Arham, M. (2024). The Influence of Gadgets on EFL Student’s Desire to Learn: Transcending the Digital Realm. Research and Innovation in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 124.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Versi
- 2025-08-09 (3)
- 2025-08-05 (2)
- 2025-08-05 (1)
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Ananda Salsabilah Ramadhani, Amirullah Abduh, Abdul Halim

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Tamaddun journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain the copyright and grant Tamaddun the right of first publication. The work will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits others to share the work with proper acknowledgment of the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors may enter into additional non-exclusive agreements for the distribution of the published version of their work (e.g., posting it to an institutional repository or including it in a book), provided that the initial publication in this journal is acknowledged.
3. Authors are encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal websites) before and during the submission process. This can lead to productive exchanges and increase the visibility and citation of the published work.